Back Arrow News & Insights

Use Cases

Dairy Feed Use Case

Decorative Shape

The Challenge

Forage crops such as corn silage, haylage, and pasture are essential components of dairy cow diets, providing the critical nutrients needed to meet the growing global demand for milk production in an environmentally sustainable way. These crops are predominantly grown in regions like the United States, Europe, South America, and Australia and New Zealand. However, producing high-quality forage comes with several challenges. Climate change has introduced unpredictable weather patterns, which affect the consistency of crop yields and nutrient content. Maintaining the nutritional profile necessary for optimal milk production requires careful management across all types of forage systems. While the following example focuses on corn silage, similar challenges are also present in haylage and pasture systems.

The Solution

RegenIQ helps the dairy industry, farmers and agronomists assess the effectiveness of their forage production practices, enabling them to make informed adjustments that enhance both yield and nutritional quality. By evaluating nutrient management, RegenIQ ensures that crops develop robustly, resulting in feed with higher energy content and digestibility. Practices such as ground cover and crop rotations, can also significantly affect the carbon sequestered in the dairy system, providing a staked-win for farmers and the industry. Although this solution is demonstrated through corn silage, the insights and adjustments provided by RegenIQ are equally applicable across haylage and pasture systems.

The efforts are a set of indicators to monitor the practices used to impact regenerative agriculture across soil health, water, biodiversity, and climate.

    • Ground cover

      17.2 / 17.2

    • Organic carbon application

      20.6 / 29.5

    • Soil Compaction mitigation

      15.6 / 15.6

    • Crop rotations

      23.6 / 29.5

    • Tillage management

      5.8 / 8.2

    Total

    82.8 / 100

    • Water source

      12.5 / 25.0

    • Water delivery method

      23.7 / 25.0

    • Irrigation rate decision method

      12.5 / 25.0

    • Irrigation power source

      15.0 / 25.0

    Total

    63.7 / 100

    • Deforestation avoidance

      40.8 / 40.8

    • Crop rotations

      14.1 / 17.6

    • Crop protection

      5.1 / 8.4

    • Ground cover

      14.4 / 14.4

    • Nutrient source

      6.6 / 7.0

    • Buffer strips

      4.7 / 11.8

    Total

    85.7 / 100

    • Nutrient rate

      17.8 / 25.4

    • Nutrient timing

      31.9 / 31.9

    • Nutrient source

      10.5 / 13.1

    • Soil pH management

      11.3 / 11.3

    • Buffer strips

      7.3 / 18.3

    Total

    78.8 / 100

The outcomes are a set of indicators used to monitor sustainability levels and evaluate them against site-specific benchmarks.

    • SOC / Clay ratio

      13.3 / 16.7

    • Permanganate-oxidizable carbon

      10.0 / 16.7

    • Soil respiration

      6.7 / 16.7

    • ACE Protein

      6.7 / 16.7

    • Aggregate stability

      13.3 / 16.7

    • Earthworms density

      10.0 / 16.7

    Total

    60.0 / 100

    • Irrigation water use

      100 / 100

    Total

    100 / 100

    • Beneficial insect diversity

      20.0 / 50.0

    • Plant species diversity

      20.0 / 50.0

    Total

    40.0 / 100

    • N balance

      0 / 33.3

    • P balance

      16.7 / 33.3

    • Yield-scaled CO2 losses

      20.0 / 33.3

    Total

    36.7 / 100

Request a Demo

Find out more and connect with us. We’re here to answer any questions you may have and look forward to hearing from you.