Back Arrow News & Insights

Use Cases

Grapes Use Case

Decorative Shape

The Challenge

Table grapes are a significant crop in the global fresh fruit market, predominantly grown in regions like California, Chile, South Africa, and parts of Europe and India. These regions provide the ideal climates for growing high-quality table grapes, but they are increasingly challenged by climate change. Issues such as unpredictable weather patterns, pest infestations (e.g., grapevine moth), and diseases like powdery mildew and botrytis bunch rot can severely impact the yield, appearance, and quality of table grapes, which are critical factors for market acceptance.

The Solution

RegenIQ supports the grape and wine industry, growers and viticulturists through their agronomist partners by providing a detailed assessment of current practices, enabling them to fine-tune their approach for optimal results. This includes analyzing the timing and application of nutrients to ensure that the grapes develop the desired size, flavor, and appearance essential for the fresh fruit market. RegenIQ also evaluates the impact of pest and disease management strategies, helping growers to refine their practices to reduce the risk of damage while maintaining the aesthetic quality of the grapes. Additionally, the framework assesses crop water requirements and irrigation water use, quantifying irrigation water surplus and inefficiencies. By focusing on these key areas, RegenIQ empowers growers to make informed adjustments that improve the resilience and marketability of their table grape crops. While this case study focused on table grapes, the framework can be applied to wine grapes as well.

The efforts are a set of indicators to monitor the practices used to impact regenerative agriculture across soil health, water, biodiversity, and climate.

    • Residue management

      10 / 16.7

    • Ground cover

      11.7 / 16.7

    • Organic carbon application

      26.6 / 33.3

    • Soil Compaction mitigation

      16.7 / 16.7

    • Tillage management

      16.7 / 16.7

    Total

    81.7 / 100

    • Water source

      12.5 / 25.0

    • Water delivery method

      22.5 / 25.0

    • Irrigation rate decision method

      20.0 / 25.0

    • Irrigation power source

      10.0 / 25.0

    Total

    65.0 / 100

    • Deforestation avoidance

      16.7 / 41.9

    • Crop protection

      13.2 / 18.8

    • Ground cover

      10.1 / 14.5

    • Nutrient source

      5.5 / 10.9

    • Buffer strips

      9.7 / 13.9

    Total

    55.2 / 100

    • Nutrient rate

      30.1 / 35.4

    • Nutrient timing

      16.3 / 23.3

    • Nutrient source

      12.9 / 21.5

    • Soil pH management

      9.9 / 9.9

    • Buffer strips

      7.9 / 9.9

    Total

    77.1 / 100

The outcomes are a set of indicators used to monitor sustainability levels and evaluate them against site-specific benchmarks.

    • SOC / Clay ratio

      13.3 / 16.7

    • Permanganate-oxidizable carbon

      10.0 / 16.7

    • Soil respiration

      13.3 / 16.7

    • ACE Protein

      13.3 / 16.7

    • Aggregate stability

      6.7 / 16.7

    • Earthworms density

      6.7 / 16.7

    Total

    63.3 / 100

    • Irrigation water use

      33.0 / 100

    Total

    33.0 / 100

    • Beneficial insects diversity

      13.3 / 33.3

    • Pollinator density

      13.3 / 33.3

    • Plant species diversity

      6.7 / 33.3

    Total

    33.3 / 100

    • N balance

      0 / 33.3

    • P balance

      16.7 / 33.0

    • Yield-scaled CO2 losses

      13.3 / 33.0

    Total

    30.0 / 100

Request a Demo

Find out more and connect with us. We’re here to answer any questions you may have and look forward to hearing from you.